Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2007;115:67-75
Published online before print December 26, 2006, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.640698
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
115/1/67    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.106.640698v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kapur, N. K.
Right arrow Articles by Rade, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kapur, N. K.
Right arrow Articles by Rade, J. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congestive
Right arrow Physiological and pathological control of gene expression
Right arrow Arterial thrombosis
Right arrow Thrombin
Right arrow Embolic stroke
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide

(Circulation. 2007;115:67-75.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Heart Failure

Hemodynamic Modulation of Endocardial Thromboresistance

Navin K. Kapur, MD; Clayton B. Deming, MS; Sunil Kapur, BS; Ce Bian, MD; Hunter C. Champion, MD, PhD; J. Kevin Donahue, MD; David A. Kass, MD; Jeffrey J. Rade, MD

From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology of the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.

Correspondence to Jeffrey J. Rade, MD, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Carnegie 568, 600 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287. E-mail jjrade{at}jhmi.edu

Received April 3, 2006; accepted October 13, 2006.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Patients with heart failure are at increased risk for thromboembolic events, including stroke. Historically attributed to blood stasis, little is known about the adverse effects of elevated chamber filling pressure on endocardial function, which could predispose to intracardiac thrombus formation.

Methods and Results— We investigated changes in the expression of thrombomodulin, a key component of the anticoagulant protein C pathway, in rats subjected to acute atrial pressure overload caused by aortic banding. Acute elevation of left atrial filling pressure, without an associated decline in ventricular systolic function, caused a 70% inhibition of atrial endocardial thrombomodulin expression and resulted in increased local thrombin generation. Targeted restoration of atrial thrombomodulin expression with adenovirus-mediated gene transfer successfully reduced thrombin generation to baseline levels. In vitro co-culture studies revealed that thrombomodulin downregulation is caused by the paracrine release of transforming growth factor-ß from cardiac connective tissue in response to mechanical stretch. This was confirmed in vivo by administration of a neutralizing transforming growth factor-ß antibody, which effectively prevented thrombomodulin downregulation during acute pressure overload.

Conclusions— These findings suggest that increased hemodynamic load adversely affects endocardial function and is a potentially important contributor to thromboembolus formation in heart failure.


Key Words: endocardium • heart failure • thrombosis • thrombomodulin


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Congestive heart failure is a growing public health problem that affects more than 5 million people in the United States. Thromboembolic events, including stroke, are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure.1 The annual risk of a thromboembolic event with mild to moderate heart failure and sinus rhythm ranges from 1.5% to 2.5% and exceeds 5% in severe disease.2,3 Thromboembolus formation in heart failure has historically been ascribed to blood stasis within the dilated cardiac chambers.4 Stasis alone, however, cannot fully explain intracardiac thrombus formation, as even patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function remain at increased risk for stroke compared with those without heart failure.5 Although recent evidence does suggest that heart failure may be associated with a mild degree of hypercoagulation,6 what has received relatively little attention and yet may be a significant contributor to intracardiac thrombus formation is the third arm of Virchow’s triad—dysfunction of the endocardial endothelium.

Thrombomodulin is a 100-kDa membrane glycoprotein that is a major regulator of vascular thromboresistance.7 It is expressed in abundance by vascular endothelial cells, including those that comprise the endocardium.8 Thrombomodulin binds thrombin and renders it incapable of enzymatically cleaving fibrinogen or activating cellular thrombin receptors, but enables the activation of circulating protein C. Activated protein C (APC) degrades factors Va and XIIIa of the coagulation cascade, potently inhibiting further thrombin generation. Deletion of the thrombomodulin gene causes lethal thrombosis in mice, and the acquired loss of thrombomodulin in humans is thought to contribute to the thrombotic manifestations of bacterial sepsis, radiation enteropathy, and coronary atherosclerosis.9–11

Clinical Perspective p 75

We recently identified pressure-induced vascular stretch as a novel and potent inhibitory stimulus for endothelial thrombomodulin expression.12 This was first observed in rabbit vein segments implanted into the arterial circulation; thrombomodulin protein expression decreased by 95% and resulted in increased local thrombin generation and microthrombus formation.13 On the basis of these studies, we hypothesize that pressure-induced chamber stretch might also negatively regulate endocardial thrombomodulin expression and contribute to intracardiac thrombus formation during heart failure. To explore this, we characterized endocardial thrombomodulin expression and function in a rat model of acute pressure overload. We then used adenovirus-mediated gene transfer to determine the relationship between thrombomodulin function and endocardial thromboresistance and identified an important role of paracrine effects of transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) in regulation of endocardial thrombomodulin expression.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Rat Model of Pressure Overload
Animal protocols were approved by the Johns Hopkins Animal Care and Use Committee. A well-characterized rat model was used with modification.14 Six-week-old male Wistar rats that weighed {approx}100g (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, Mass) were anesthetized with 1% to 2% isoflurane and mechanically ventilated. Through a right thoracotomy, a 23-gauge needle was placed adjacent to the ascending aorta and a 4-0 silk suture ligature was applied around both. The needle was then removed to create an immediate >70% luminal stenosis. Sham control animals underwent thoracotomy without suture placement. To investigate the effects of TGF-ß, rats were administered 1 mg/kg of either a neutralizing anti–TGF-ß antibody (MAB240; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn) or an IgG1 isotype control antibody (MAB005; R&D Systems) via peritoneal injection 24 hours before surgery, with a second dose of 0.5 mg/kg administered 48 hours after surgery. The antibody dose was based on previous studies in the rat that demonstrated effective neutralization of TGF-ß.15

At euthanization, echocardiographic measurements were obtained with a Sonos 550 Ultrasound System (Hewlett-Packard, Andover, Mass) equipped with a 15-MHz probe (Acuson, Siemens, Malvern, Pa) with validated techniques in rodents.16 Ventricular pressures were measured directly via cardiac puncture with a 21-gauge needle attached to a pressure monitor (SpaceLabs, Redmond, Wash).

Atrial Gene Transfer
The construction of adenovirus vectors that express human thrombomodulin (AdTMh5) and no transgene (AdNull) have been previously described.13 The left atrium was exposed via a left thoracotomy and 400 µL of a solution of 20% Pluronic F-127 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Ore), 0.5% trypsin, and 1010 plaque-forming units/mL of the indicated adenovirus vector were directly applied to the epicardial surface of the left atrium with a camel-hair paintbrush. The applied solution was allowed to gel for 10 minutes before closure of the thoracotomy. Five days after atrial gene transfer, the ascending aorta was banded as described. The expression of recombinant human thrombomodulin protein in transduced atria was assessed in tissue lysates by ELISA as described.13

Assessment of Neurohormonal Activation
At the time of euthanization, levels of angiotensin II, atrial natriuretic peptide, and brain natriuretic peptide were determined in extracted serum with EIA kits that recognize rat peptides (Phoenix Pharmaceuticals, Belmont, Calif) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Serum tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} concentrations were measured by rat tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} ELISA kit (BioSource, Camarillo, Calif) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.

Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction
RNA from freshly harvested tissue or cultured cells was extracted using TRIZOL Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif). Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed with a 7900HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif). Triplicate samples were subjected to reverse transcription and real-time PCR with TaqMan One-Step RT-PCR Master Mix Reagents with gene-specific primers and probes designed by Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems) based on published nucleotide sequences (see Data Supplement). Thrombomodulin gene expression was normalized to endothelial-specific RNA content by quantification of rat CD31 gene expression. Thrombomodulin gene expression in cultured cells and TGF-ß gene expression in both tissue samples and cultured cells were normalized to 18S ribosomal RNA (TaqMan Ribosomal RNA Reagents with VIC-labeled probe; Applied Biosystems).

Western Blot and Immunohistochemical Analyses
Western blot analysis was performed with anti-thrombomodulin antibodies (#3381 and #2380; American Diagnostica) and an anti-CD31 antibody (M0823; Dako, Carpinteria, Calif) as described.13 Bands were detected by autoradiography and quantified densitometrically with UN-SCAN-IT software (Silk Scientific, Orem, Utah). Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded sections of rat left atria with antibodies against rat thrombomodulin (#3381; American Diagnostica), human TGF-ß latent associated peptide (EF01; R&D), and rat prolyl 4-hydoxylase (6-9H6; Acris Antibodies, Hiddenhausen, Germany) as described.8

In Situ Protein C and Thrombin Activity Assays
Capacity to generate APC was measured on freshly-harvested whole left atria with a previously described protocol with modifiction.13 The atria were washed in Hank’s buffered salt solution and then incubated in 250 µL Hank’s buffered salt solution that contained 40 nmol/L human {alpha}-thrombin (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Mo) and 1 µmol/L human protein C (American Diagnostica) at 37°C. After 60 minutes, thrombin was neutralized by excess lepirudin (Berlex Laboratories, Montville, NJ). Aliquots measuring 100 µL were incubated at room temperature with a 3-mmol/L solution of the chromogenic substrate S-2366 (DiaPharma, West Chester, Ohio). The rate of substrate conversion was determined spectrophotometrically with a Vmax Kinetic Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, Calif) and the amount of protein C activation calculated by comparison with a human APC (American Diagnostica) standard curve. Bound thrombin activity on the atrial endocardial surface was measured as previously described with some modification.13 Freshly excised whole atria were washed in Hank’s buffered salt solution, then incubated in 250 µL of substrate buffer (50 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 175 nmol/L NaCl, and 2 mmol/L CaCl2 [pH 7.8] that contained 333 µmol/L of the chromogenic substrate, S-2238 (DiaPharma) at 37°C for 30 minutes. The change in absorbance at 405 nm before and after lepirudin treatment represented thrombin-specific substrate conversion. Bound thrombin activity was then calculated by comparison with a human {alpha}-thrombin standard curve.

In Vitro Stretch Experiments
Human atrial endocardial cells isolated in our laboratory (see Data Supplement) and human cardiac fibroblasts purchased from Cell Applications (San Diego, Calif) of passage 2 to 3 were plated onto type I collagen-coated 6-well Bioflex plates (Flexcell International, Hillsborough, NC) and grown in either EGM-2 (endocardial cells) or FGM-2 (fibroblasts) culture media (BioWhittaker). When nearly confluent, cells were refreshed in basal media and subjected to 0% to 10% cyclic strain delivered at 1 Hz for 24 hours at 37°C and 5% CO2 with a FX-4000T Tension Plus System (Flexcell International). For co-culture experiments, atrial endocardial cells were grown on 24-mm diameter Transwell inserts with a 0.4-µm pore size (Corning, Corning, NY) in EGM-2 medium. When confluent, the inserts were placed into the individual wells of the Bioflex plates with cardiac fibroblasts in basal medium (BioWhittaker). The cardiac fibroblasts were then subjected to 0% to 10% cyclic strain at 1 Hz for 24 hours. To investigate the effects of TGF-ß, 0.5 µg/mL of either a neutralizing anti–TGF-ß (MAB240; R&D) or IgG1 isotype control antibody (MAB005; R&D) were added to the medium before stretching the fibroblasts at 10% cyclic strain delivered at 1 Hz for 24 hours.

Statistical Analysis
All data are presented as mean±SEM. Comparison between 2 groups is by 2-tailed t tests and between multiple groups is by 1-way ANOVA with a Bonferroni correction for intergroup comparisons. Statistical relationships not otherwise indicated are to be assumed nonsignificant (P>0.05).

The authors had full access to and take responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Effects of Acute Pressure Overload on Endocardial Thrombomodulin Expression
The ascending aortae of 6-week-old rats were suture-banded to induce a >70% luminal constriction. Because this degree of acute increase in afterload results in pulmonary edema and death within 7 days of surgery, all hemodynamic and echocardiographic measurements were obtained 96 hours after banding. Compared with sham-operated controls, left ventricular systolic pressure increased 40% in banded animals, whereas left ventricular diastolic pressure, equivalent to mean left atrial pressure, increased by nearly 400% (P<0.0001 for both; Figure 1A). Ventricular wall thickness and diastolic diameter were unchanged, whereas left atrial diameter increased slightly (Figure 1B). Systolic function was not depressed in this acute period, with slight increases in ejection fractions (77±9% banded versus 65±5% sham controls, P<0.01), which likely reflect acute compensation to high afterload.17 Serum atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide levels were >3-fold higher in banded rats, consistent with the induction of heart failure, whereas angiotensin II and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} levels did not differ from controls (Figure 1C).


Figure 1180100
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Effects of suture banding of the ascending aorta 96 hours after surgery. A, Left ventricular systolic and diastolic pressures measured by cardiac puncture (n=8 per group). B, Left atrial (LA) diameter, left ventricular diastolic posterior wall thickness (LVPWd), and left ventricular internal diastolic diameter (LVIDd) as measured by echocardiography (n=8 per group). C, Serum levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP; n=6 to 8 per group), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP; n=7 to 8 per group), angiotensin II (AT II; n=7 to 8 per group), and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} (TNF-{alpha}; n=3 to 4 per group).

To determine the impact of acute hemodynamic changes on endocardial thrombomodulin expression, tissue from the left atrium and ventricle of banded rats was subjected to quantitative PCR analysis and compared with sham controls (Figure 2A). Aortic tissue, distal to the suture ligature, was analyzed as an additional control. Data were normalized to CD31, an endothelial-specific adhesion molecule whose expression does not change with pressure-induced cell stretch.18 Thrombomodulin expression in the left atrium of banded rats declined by 60% compared with sham controls (P=0.01), whereas thrombomodulin expression in the left ventricle or in the distal aorta was unchanged. Western blot analysis of left atrial tissue confirmed a 70% decline in thrombomodulin expression (P<0.002; Figure 2B). Left atrial tissue stained with an anti-mouse thrombomodulin antibody verified decreased thrombomodulin expression by the atrial endocardial endothelium (Figure 2C). These data suggest that endocardial thrombomodulin expression is directly modulated by changes in chamber loading rather than by systemic factors induced by acute heart failure.


Figure 2180100
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Effect of acute pressure overload on endocardial thrombomodulin (TM) expression. A, Thrombomodulin gene expression, normalized to CD31, was determined by quantitative PCR of tissue extracts obtained from the left atrium (n=10 per group), left ventricle (n=10 per group), and the distal aorta (n=8 per group) of banded and sham rats 96 hours after surgery. B, Thrombomodulin protein expression, normalized to CD31, was determined by densitometric analysis of Western blots of left atrial tissue extracts obtained from banded and sham rats (n=4 to 5 per group) 96 hours after surgery. The right panel depicts a representative Western blot. C, Histological sections of left atrial tissue obtained from sham and banded rats 96 hours after surgery and stained with an anti-mouse thrombomodulin antibody that shows decreased endocardial thrombomodulin protein expression.

We also determined whether acute pressure overload altered the atrial expression of other molecules known to modulate endocardial thromboresistance (Figure 3). Aortic banding did not alter the expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase but was associated with increased tissue factor pathway inhibitor and decreased tissue factor expression. The net effect of these changes would be expected to reduce local thrombin generation at the endocardial surface. Interestingly, banding also increased the expressions of both tissue plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1.


Figure 3180100
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Effect of acute pressure overload on the expression of molecules that modulate endocardial thromboresistance. Gene expression, normalized to CD31, was determined by quantitative PCR of tissue extracts obtained from the left atrium of banded and sham rats 96 hours after surgery (n=10 per group). eNOS indicates endothelial nitric oxide synthase; TF, tissue factor; TFPI, tissue factor pathway inhibitor; tPA, tissue plasminogen activator; and PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1.

Consequences of Thrombomodulin Downregulation on Endocardial Thromboresistance
Thrombomodulin exerts its anticoagulant effect via activation of circulating protein C. Endocardial capacity to generate APC was measured in resected whole left atria 96 hours after surgery. Aortic banding reduced the capacity to generate APC in the left atria of banded rats by >35% compared with sham controls (P=0.01; Figure 4A). To determine the effect on in situ thrombin generation, the activity of thrombin bound to the atrial endocardial surface was then quantified. Thrombin generated at sites of vascular injury binds to fibrin strands within a developing clot and is protected from inactivation by circulating inhibitors. Bound thrombin activity is therefore proportional to the degree of thrombus that is present and is capable of detecting the presence of microscopic amounts of fibrin clot.12 Bound thrombin activity in the atria of banded rats was significantly higher than in atria from sham-operated controls and approached that observed in atria subjected to direct mechanical forcep injury (Figure 4B).


Figure 4180100
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Effects of thrombomodulin expression on endocardial thromboresistance. A, Capacity to generate APC was assessed 96 hours after surgery in the left atrium of sham-operated and banded rats (n=10 per group) as well as in banded rats whose left atria were transduced with either AdNull or AdTMh5 5 days before surgical banding (n=5 per group). B, Bound thrombin activity, proportional to microthrombus burden, was measured 96 hours after surgery in the left atria of sham-operated and banded rats (n=10 per group) as well as in banded rats whose left atria were transduced with either AdNull or AdTMh5 5 days before surgical banding (n=5 per group). C, Rat LA were transduced with either AdNull (n=5) or AdTMh5 (n=8) 5 days before surgical banding; 96 hours after banding, thrombomodulin gene expression was determined in atrial tissue by quantitative PCR with species-specific probes and primers. D, Rat left atria were transduced with either AdNull or AdTMh5, an adenovirus vector expressing human thrombomodulin. Three days after transduction, atrial tissue was subjected to Western blot analysis with antibodies that recognize the human isoform of thrombomodulin and rat CD31. The depicted blot is representative of 3 experiments.

We then determined the effects of thrombomodulin expression restoration on capacity to generate APC and bound thrombin activity. This was accomplished with a "gene painting" technique, in which solutions that contain adenovirus vectors that express either human thrombomodulin (AdTM5) or no transgene (AdNull) were applied to the epicardial surfaces of the rat left atria. Previous studies in the pig revealed that this technique results in efficient transmural transduction of atrial cells, including the endocardial endothelium.19 Figure I illustrates the degree of gene transfer that can be attained with this method in the rat. Three days after transduction, protein lysates of left atrial tissue subjected to ELISA that detects only the human form of thrombomodulin13 revealed an average of 76.5±24.9 ng of human thrombomodulin per milligram of atrial tissue in AdTMh5-transduced atria (n=4), whereas no human thrombomodulin was detected in AdNull-transduced atria (n=3; P<0.004). These results were confirmed by Western blot analysis (Figure 4C). To verify that acute pressure overload does not attenuate transgene expression, transduced atria from suture-banded rats were assayed for the expression of both human and native rat thrombomodulin by quantitative PCR 96 hours after surgery. Figure 4D demonstrates that human thrombomodulin gene expression remains robust throughout the experimental period in AdTMh5-transduced atria, whereas no human thrombomodulin gene expression could be detected in AdNull-transduced atria. Restoration of thrombomodulin expression with adenovirus-mediated gene transfer effectively prevented the loss of capacity to generate APC induced by aortic banding (Figure 4A) and reduced the levels of bound thrombin activity to baseline values (Figure 4B). Taken together, these data support the concept that downregulation of endocardial thrombomodulin contributes to increased local thrombin generation.

Effects of Stretch on Thrombomodulin Expression in Isolated Endocardial Endothelial Cells
We have previously shown that thrombomodulin downregulation in vein segments exposed to arterial pressure results from pressure-induced vascular stretch and not from the direct effects of pressure per se.12 To determine whether stretch can directly inhibit thrombomodulin gene expression, endocardial endothelial cells isolated from human right atrial appendages were grown on collagen-coated silastic membranes and subjected to increasing amounts of cyclic stretch for 24 hours. Surprisingly, cyclic stretch resulted in a trend toward increased thrombomodulin gene expression (Figure 5A). Similar results were observed in stretched endothelial cells isolated from both rabbit jugular veins and human umbilical veins (data not shown). Because endocardial endothelial cells in situ lie adjacent to cardiac connective tissue, we next tested whether this interaction might influence thrombomodulin expression by stretch. Human atrial endocardial cells were cultured on stationary filters suspended in the media of wells that contain human cardiac fibroblast subjected to increasing amounts of cyclic stretch. Stretching of cardiac fibroblasts resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in thrombomodulin expression in the stationary endocardial cells (Figure 5B). Experiments that substituted human aortic smooth cells for cardiac fibroblasts yielded identical results (data not shown). These results indicate that endocardial thrombomodulin expression is modulated in paracrine fashion by a soluble factor released by cardiac connective tissue in response to stretch.


Figure 5180100
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Effect of cyclic stretch on endocardial thrombomodulin expression. A, Human atrial endothelial cells were plated on collagen-coated Bioflex plates and subjected to increasing amounts of cyclic stretch at 1 Hz for 24 hours. Thrombomodulin gene expression, normalized to rRNA, was determined by quantitative PCR (n=5 per group). B, Human atrial endocardial cells were plated on stationary filters, submerged in the media of human cardiac fibroblasts, and subjected to increasing amounts of cyclic stretch at 1 Hz for 24 hours. Thrombomodulin gene expression, normalized to rRNA, was determined by quantitative PCR (n=4 per group).

Modulation of Thrombomodulin Expression by Paracrine Release of TGF-ß
TGF-ß is a multifunctional stretch-induced growth factor known to be intimately involved in cardiac remodeling induced by heart failure20 and has been reported to inhibit thrombomodulin protein expression in human umbilical vein endothelial cells.21 TGF-ß gene expression in cardiac fibroblasts exhibited a dose-dependent increase in response to cyclic stretch (Figure 6A). In addition, thrombomodulin gene expression in human atrial endocardial cells was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner after 24-hour exposure to recombinant TGF-ß1 (Figure 6B). To determine whether TGF-ß is the paracrine factor responsible for thrombomodulin downregulation, human endocardial cells were plated on stationary filters submerged in the media of cardiac fibroblasts subjected to 10% cyclic stretch for 24 hours in the presence of a neutralizing anti–TGF-ß antibody or an isotype control antibody. Figure 6C shows that neutralization of TGF-ß effectively prevented the downregulation of endocardial thrombomodulin gene expression.


Figure 6180100
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. Effect of TGF-ß on endocardial thrombomodulin expression. A, Human cardiac fibroblasts were subjected to increasing amounts of cyclic stretch for 24 hours. TGF-ß gene expression, normalized to rRNA, was determined by quantitative PCR (n=6 per group). B, Human atrial endocardial cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of recombinant human TGF-ß1 for 24 hours. Thrombomodulin gene expression, normalized to rRNA, was determined by quantitative PCR (n=4 per group). C, Human atrial endocardial cells were plated on stationary filters, submerged in the media of human cardiac fibroblasts, and subjected to 10% cyclic stretch for 24 hours in the presence of 0.5 µg/mL of neutralizing TGF-ß or isotype control antibodies. Thrombomodulin gene expression, normalized to rRNA, was determined by quantitative PCR (n=4 per group).

To determine whether paracrine release of TGF-ß is responsible for in vivo modulation of thrombomodulin, we first assessed TGF-ß expression in the cardiovascular tissue of rats subjected to aortic banding. Compared with sham-operated controls, TGF-ß gene expression in the left atrium of banded rats increased by >200% (P<0.001), whereas there was no significant change in TGF-ß expression in the left ventricle or in the distal aorta (Figure 7A). Banding was also associated with increased TGF-ß activation, as evidenced by positive immunostaining for latency-associated peptide, the cleaved propeptide of the TGF-ß precursor molecule that remains noncovalently attached to active TGF-ß. Latency-associated peptide staining localized predominantly to fibroblast-appearing cells in the subendocardial space that also expressed an abundance of the prolyl 4-hydroxylase, an enzyme involved in collagen synthesis (Figure 7B). To determine whether TGF-ß inhibition could prevent thrombomodulin downregulation, rats were administered either a neutralizing anti–TGF-ß antibody or an isotype control antibody in the perioperative period. Neutralization of TGF-ß effectively prevented thrombomodulin downregulation in the left atrium 96 hours after aortic banding (Figure 7C). Importantly, there was no meaningful difference in the hemodynamic response to banding between rats administered the anti–TGF-ß antibody versus the isotype control antibody (left ventricular end-diastolic pressure 17.7±0.6 versus 15.8±0.2 mm Hg, respectively; P=0.02). These data confirm that the effects of pressure overload on endocardial thrombomodulin expression and thromboresistance are mediated via paracrine release of TGF-ß.


Figure 7180100
View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 7. Effect of TGF-ß on endocardial thrombomodulin expression in heart failure. A, TGF-ß gene expression, normalized to rRNA, was determined by quantitative PCR of tissue extracts obtained from the left atrium (n=10 per group), left ventricle (n=8 per group), and the distal aorta (n=8 per group) of banded and sham-operated rats 96 hours after surgery. B, Sham and banded atria were immunostained for TGF-ß activation with an antibody that recognized the cleaved latency associated peptide (LAP). TGF-ß activation localized to fibroblast-appearing cells in the subendocardial space that abundantly express rat prolyl 4-hydroxylase (rPH). C, Rats were administered 1 mg/kg of either a neutralizing anti–TGF-ß or isotype control antibody 24 hours before aortic banding and a second dose of 0.5 mg/kg 48 hours postoperatively. Thrombomodulin gene expression, normalized to CD31, was determined 96 hours after surgery by quantitative PCR of left atrial tissue extracts and compared with sham-operated controls (n=6 per group).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The major findings of this study are (1) acute elevations in filling pressure adversely affect atrial endocardial thrombomodulin expression; (2) downregulation of endocardial thrombomodulin expression impairs local protein C activation and contributes to local thrombin generation; and (3) endocardial thrombomodulin expression is negatively regulated during acute pressure overload by the paracrine effects of TGF-ß secreted by cardiac connective tissue in response to pressure-induced chamber stretch.

It has long been recognized that patients with heart failure develop intracardiac thrombi that cause cerebral, pulmonary, and peripheral arterial thromboembolization. Thrombus formation has traditionally been viewed as a consequence of blood stasis that results from impaired ventricular function. If the presence of atrial fibrillation is excluded, however, the degree of left ventricular dysfunction only weakly correlates with thromboembolic risk.3 This suggests that factors other than stasis contribute to intracardiac thrombus formation in patients with heart failure, of which the overwhelming majority remain in sinus rhythm. We believe that ours is the first study to convincingly demonstrate that elevated cardiac filling pressures can adversely affect endocardial function and predispose to intracardiac thrombus formation independent of blood stasis.

Thrombomodulin is but 1 of several anticoagulant molecules expressed by endothelial cells that protect against pathological thrombosis. The level of thrombomodulin expression varies among endothelial cell types and therefore its relative contribution to vascular thromboresistance may differ between vascular beds.22,23 Several elements of the present study suggest that thrombomodulin is a critical contributor to endocardial thromboresistance. The first is that thrombomodulin is expressed in abundance by the endocardial endothelium. In addition to the rat, we have also found that in situ endocardial thrombomodulin expression is also robust in the rabbit8 and in humans (Figure II). Second, increased local thrombin generation in our model was proportional to the downregulation of thrombomodulin and occurred despite changes in the expression of other anticoagulant molecules that would be expected to inhibit thrombus formation. Third, and most important, targeted restoration of thrombomodulin expression with adenovirus-mediated gene transfer effectively reduced local thrombin generation.

In prior studies with rabbit vein grafts, we identified pressure-induced vascular stretch as a novel and potent negative regulator of in vivo thrombomodulin expression. The present study extends these findings by providing evidence of a second, and uniquely important, vascular bed in which stretch modulates thrombomodulin expression and by identifying paracrine release of TGF-ß as the critical molecular mediator. TGF-ß is a multifunctional dimeric polypeptide growth factor involved in a diverse array of biological processes that include embryogenesis, tumor growth, wound healing, and tissue remodeling.24 TGF-ß is intimately involved in the adaptive response of cardiac and vascular tissue to pressure overload. In systolic heart failure, for example, TGF-ß expression is known to be markedly increased in cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts, where it is a recognized autocrine and paracrine mediator of hypertrophy and fibrosis.25

In the model of acute pressure overload used for this study, a marked increase in local TGF-ß expression was observed in the left atrium but not in the left ventricle and appeared to originate predominantly from cardiac fibroblasts. This was likely the result of the relatively greater hemodynamic load imposed on the atrium and explains why endocardial thrombomodulin expression in the ventricle did not change. A recognized limitation of this model is the absence of ventricular remodeling and systolic dysfunction common to most chronic heart failure models. Although the model mostly replicates features of diastolic heart failure, it was precisely the absence of systolic dysfunction that obviated potential confounding effects of blood stasis on intracardiac thrombin generation. In models of chronic systolic dysfunction, TGF-ß expression is increased in ventricular tissue,26 and it is reasonable to predict that thrombomodulin expression in the overlying endocardium would also be reduced. Adaptive responses, however, may complicate this issue, as there is evidence that myocardial TGF-ß expression may vary according to the cause of heart failure and may change over time as heart failure progresses.27,28 This raises the possibility that the risk and chamber origin of thrombus formation may change over time, and the risk may be greater for different types of heart failure. With the observed association between TGF-ß expression and endocardial dysfunction as a conceptual framework, future studies that use chronic models of systolic heart failure can be used to investigate these possibilities.

Extremely little is known about the molecular mechanism by which TGF-ß regulates thrombomodulin expression in endothelial cells. TGF-ß signal transduction is initiated via binding to specific serine/threonine type I and type II receptor complexes located on the endothelial cell surface.29 Receptor engagement causes the phosphorylation of several intracellular effector molecules known as Smads. Whereas most of the Smad proteins positively regulate TGF-ß signal transduction, Smad6 and Smad7 are known to exert inhibitory effects. In the only published study to date that investigates the mechanism of thrombomodulin modulation by TGF-ß, antisense inhibition of Smad7 potentiated the effects of TGF-ß, whereas antisense inhibition of a splice variant of Smad6, known as Smad6s, unexpectedly blunted the downregulation of thrombomodulin in human umbilical endothelial cells by TGF-ß.30 As Smad6 and Smad7 are differentially expressed in the endothelium of normal and atherosclerotic arteries,30 they may be able to differentially modulate the paracrine effects of TGF-ß on thrombomodulin expression in various vascular beds and disease states. What remains completely unknown at the present time is the nature of the signaling pathway distal to Smad activation that may regulate thrombomodulin gene transcription.

In addition to heart failure, our findings may have implications for understanding the thrombogenic potential of other forms of cardiovascular disease, such as atrial fibrillation. Thrombus formation in atrial fibrillation is also primarily ascribed to blood stasis in a left atrial appendage that is not contracting. However, it is well known that atrial fibrillation in patients with structurally normal hearts, ie, "lone atrial fibrillation," is associated with a relatively small risk (<0.5% per year) of thromboembolic stroke compared with atrial fibrillation that occurs in the setting of hypertension, heart failure, or valvular heart disease (5% to 12% per year).31 As these latter conditions are all characterized by pressure-induced atrial distension, it is possible that endocardial dysfunction and altered thrombomodulin expression may contribute substantially to the thromboembolic risk in these patients. This concept is supported by data from a rat model of atrial fibrillation in which atrial thrombomodulin expression decreased by 35% after 8 hours of rapid atrial pacing.32 Interestingly, the left atrial pressure in this model triples during pacing,33 which raises the possibility that the effects on thrombomodulin expression were primarily the result of hemodynamic rather than electrical influences.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Sources of Funding

This work was supported in part by an American Heart Association Grant-in-Aid (0555515U) to Dr Rade and by National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Grant HL-080142 to Dr Rade. The Flow Cytometry Cell Sorting Core Laboratory of the Bloomberg School of Public Health is supported by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease Grant 5P30AI042855.

Disclosures

None.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Fuster V, Gersh BJ, Giuliani ER, Tajik AJ, Brandenburg RO, Frye RL. The natural history of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1981; 47: 525–531.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Dunkman WB, Johnson GR, Carson PE, Bhat G, Farrell L, Cohn JN. Incidence of thromboembolic events in congestive heart failure. The V-HeFT VA Cooperative Studies Group. Circulation. 1993; 87: VI94–VI101.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Dries DL, Rosenberg YD, Waclawiw MA, Domanski MJ. Ejection fraction and risk of thromboembolic events in patients with systolic dysfunction and sinus rhythm: evidence for gender differences in the studies of left ventricular dysfunction trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29: 1074–1080.[Abstract]

4. Meltzer RS, Visser CA, Fuster V. Intracardiac thrombi and systemic embolization. Ann Intern Med. 1986; 104: 689–698.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Gottdiener JS, McClelland RL, Marshall R, Shemanski L, Furberg CD, Kitzman DW, Cushman M, Polak J, Gardin JM, Gersh BJ, Aurigemma GP, Manolio TA. Outcome of congestive heart failure in elderly persons: influence of left ventricular systolic function. The Cardiovascular Health Study. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 137: 631–639.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Gibbs CR, Blann AD, Watson RD, Lip GY. Abnormalities of hemorheological, endothelial, and platelet function in patients with chronic heart failure in sinus rhythm: effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and beta-blocker therapy. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1746–1751.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Esmon CT. The protein C anticoagulant pathway. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1992; 12: 135–145.[Free Full Text]

8. Deming CB, Kim AY, Bian C, Regard JB, Rade JJ. cDNA cloning of rabbit thrombomodulin and characterization of gene expression in cardiovascular tissue. DNA Seq. 2003; 14: 399–405.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Faust SN, Levin M, Harrison OB, Goldin RD, Lockhart MS, Kondaveeti S, Laszik Z, Esmon CT, Heyderman RS. Dysfunction of endothelial protein C activation in severe meningococcal sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 408–416.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Richter KK, Fink LM, Hughes BM, Sung C-C, Hauer-Jensen M. Is the loss of thrombomodulin involved in the mechanism of chronicity in late radiation enteropathy? Radiother Oncol. 1997; 44: 65–71.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Laszik ZG, Zhou XJ, Ferrell GL, Silva FG, Esmon CT. Down-regulation of endothelial expression of endothelial cell protein C receptor and thrombomodulin in coronary atherosclerosis. Am J Pathol. 2001; 159: 797–802.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Sperry JL, Deming CB, Bian C, Walinsky PL, Kass DA, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R, Kim AY, Rade JJ. Wall tension is a potent negative regulator of in vivo thrombomodulin expression. Circ Res. 2003; 92: 41–47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Kim AY, Walinsky PL, Kolodgie FD, Bian C, Sperry JL, Deming CB, Peck JG, Ang GB, Sohn RH, Esmon CT, Virmani R, Stuart RS, Rade JJ. Early loss of thrombomodulin expression impairs vein graft thromboresistance: implications for vein graft failure. Circ Res. 2002; 90: 205–212.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Schunkert H, Dzau VJ, Tang SS, Hirsch AT, Apstein CS, Lorell BH. Increased rat cardiac angiotensin converting enzyme activity and mRNA expression in pressure overload left ventricular hypertrophy. Effects on coronary resistance, contractility, and relaxation. J Clin Invest. 1990; 86: 1913–1920.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Koyanagi M, Egashira K, Kubo-Inoue M, Usui M, Kitamoto S, Tomita H, Shimokawa H, Takeshita A. Role of transforming growth factor-beta1 in cardiovascular inflammatory changes induced by chronic inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 86–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Litwin SE, Katz SE, Weinberg EO, Lorell BH, Aurigemma GP, Douglas PS. Serial echocardiographic-Doppler assessment of left ventricular geometry and function in rats with pressure-overload hypertrophy: chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition attenuates the transition to heart failure. Circulation. 1995; 91: 2642–2654.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Sarnoff SJ, Mitchell JH, Gilmore JP, Remensnyder JP. Homeometric autoregulation in the heart. Circ Res. 1960; 8: 1077–1091.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Lauth M, Berger MM, Cattaruzza M, Hecker M. Pressure-induced upregulation of preproendothelin-1 and endothelin B receptor expression in rabbit jugular vein in situ: implications for vein graft failure? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 96–103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Kikuchi K, McDonald AD, Sasano T, Donahue JK. Targeted modification of atrial electrophysiology by homogeneous transmural atrial gene transfer. Circulation. 2005; 111: 264–270.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Rosenkranz S. TGF-beta1 and angiotensin networking in cardiac remodeling. Cardiovasc Res. 2004; 63: 423–432.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Ohji T, Urano H, Shirahata A, Yamagishi M, Higashi K, Gotoh S, Karasaki Y. Transforming growth factor beta 1 and beta 2 induce down-modulation of thrombomodulin in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Thromb Haemost. 1995; 73: 812–818.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Maruyama I, Bell CE, Majerus PW. Thrombomodulin is found on endothelium of arteries, veins, capillaries, and lymphatics, and on synciotrophoblast of human placenta. J Cell Biol. 1985; 101: 363–371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. DeBault LE, Esmon NL, Olson JR, Esmon CT. Distribution of the thrombomodulin antigen in the rabbit vasculature. Lab Invest. 1986; 54: 172–178.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Blobe GC, Schiemann WP, Lodish HF. Role of transforming growth factor beta in human disease. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 1350–1358.[Free Full Text]

25. Azhar M, Schultz JJ, Grupp I, Dorn GW, Meneton P, Molin DG, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Doetschman T. Transforming growth factor beta in cardiovascular development and function. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2003; 14: 391–407.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Hao J, Ju H, Zhao S, Junaid A, Scammell-La Fleur T, Dixon IM. Elevation of expression of Smads 2, 3, and 4, decorin and TGF-beta in the chronic phase of myocardial infarct scar healing. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1999; 31: 667–678.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Aharinejad S, Krenn K, Paulus P, Schafer R, Zuckermann A, Grimm M, Abraham D. Differential role of TGF-beta1/bFGF and ET-1 in graft fibrosis in heart failure patients. Am J Transplant. 2005; 5: 2185–2192.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Hein S, Arnon E, Kostin S, Schonburg M, Elsasser A, Polyakova V, Bauer EP, Klovekorn WP, Schaper J. Progression from compensated hypertrophy to failure in the pressure-overloaded human heart: structural deterioration and compensatory mechanisms. Circulation. 2003; 107: 984–991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Bertolino P, Deckers M, Lebrin F, ten Dijke P. Transforming growth factor-beta signal transduction in angiogenesis and vascular disorders. Chest. 2005; 128: 585S–590S.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Sandusky G, Berg DT, Richardson MA, Myers L, Grinnell BW. Modulation of thrombomodulin-dependent activation of human protein C through differential expression of endothelial Smads. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 49815–49819.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Hart RG, Halperin JL. Atrial fibrillation and stroke: concepts and controversies. Stroke. 2001; 32: 803–808.[Free Full Text]

32. Yamashita T, Sekiguchi A, Iwasaki YK, Sagara K, Hatano S, Iinuma H, Aizawa T, Fu LT. Thrombomodulin and tissue factor pathway inhibitor in endocardium of rapidly paced rat atria. Circulation. 2003; 108: 2450–2452.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Yamashita T, Murakawa Y, Hayami N, Fukui E, Kasaoka Y, Inoue M, Omata M. Short-term effects of rapid pacing on mRNA level of voltage-dependent K(+) channels in rat atrium: electrical remodeling in paroxysmal atrial tachycardia. Circulation. 2000; 101: 2007–2014.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Patients with congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and valvular heart disease are at risk for thromboembolic events, including stroke. Thromboembolus formation in these patients has historically been attributable to blood stasis within the cardiac chambers. The present study reveals that elevated cardiac chamber filling pressure, which is common to each of these conditions, can adversely affect endocardial function and contribute to intracardiac thrombus formation. This may help explain why patients with heart failure and preserved ventricular function remain at risk for thromboembolic stroke, whereas patients with atrial fibrillation and structurally normal hearts are at relatively low risk. The present study also identifies transforming growth factor-ß, released in paracrine fashion by pressure-induced chamber stretch, as a potent negative regulator of endocardial thromboresistance. Targeted inhibition of the transforming growth factor-ß signaling pathway could represent a novel therapeutic alternative for prevention of thromboembolus formation in selected cardiac patients currently being treated with systemic anticoagulation.


*    Footnotes
 
The online-only Data Supplement, consisting of supplemental Methods, Figure I, and Figure II, is available with this article at http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.640698/DC1.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
115/1/67    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.106.640698v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kapur, N. K.
Right arrow Articles by Rade, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kapur, N. K.
Right arrow Articles by Rade, J. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congestive
Right arrow Physiological and pathological control of gene expression
Right arrow Arterial thrombosis
Right arrow Thrombin
Right arrow Embolic stroke
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide