Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2008;118:2029-2037
Published online before print October 27, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.750000
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
118/20/2029    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.750000v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, S. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID
Medline Plus Health Information
*Atrial Fibrillation
*Blood Thinners
Related Collections
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs
Right arrow Anticoagulants
Right arrow Other Stroke
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2008;118:2029-2037.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Arrhythmia/Electrophysiology

Benefit of Oral Anticoagulant Over Antiplatelet Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation Depends on the Quality of International Normalized Ratio Control Achieved by Centers and Countries as Measured by Time in Therapeutic Range

Stuart J. Connolly, MA, MD, FRCPC; Janice Pogue, MA, MSc; John Eikelboom, MBBS, MSc, FRACP, FRCPA; Gregory Flaker, MD; Patrick Commerford, MB, ChB, FCP(SA); Maria Grazia Franzosi, PhD; Jeffrey S. Healey, MD, FRCPC; Salim Yusuf, DPhil, FRCPC, on behalf of the ACTIVE W Investigators

From the Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (S.J.C., J.P., J.E., J.S.H., S.Y.); University of Missouri, Columbia (G.F.); Cardiac Clinic, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa (P.C.); and Department of Cardiovascular Research, Istituto Mario Negri, Milano, Italy (M.G.F.).

Correspondence to Dr Stuart Connolly, 237 Barton St E, Suite 504, Hamilton, Ontario, L8L 2X2 Canada. E-mail connostu{at}phri.ca

Received November 6, 2007; accepted August 27, 2008.

Background— Oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy is effective in atrial fibrillation but requires vigilance to maintain the international normalized ratio in the therapeutic range. This report examines how differences in time in therapeutic range (TTR) between centers and between countries affect the outcomes of OAC therapy.

Methods and Results— In a posthoc analysis, the TTRs of patients on OAC in a randomized trial of OAC versus clopidogrel plus aspirin (Atrial Fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial With Irbesartan for Prevention of Vascular Events [ACTIVE W]) were used to calculate the mean TTR for each of 526 centers and 15 countries. Proportional-hazards analysis, with and without adjustment for baseline variables, was performed, with patients stratified by TTR quartile and country. A wide variation in TTRs was found between centers, with mean TTRs for centers in the 4 quartiles of 44%, 60%, 69%, and 78%. For patients at centers below the median TTR (65%), no treatment benefit was demonstrated as measured by relative risk for vascular events of clopidogrel plus aspirin versus OAC (relative risk, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.70 to 1.24; P=0.61). However, for patients at centers with a TTR above the study median, OAC had a marked benefit, reducing vascular events by >2-fold (relative risk, 2.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.61 to 2.85; P<0.0001). Mean TTR also varied between countries from 46% to 78%; relative risk (clopidogrel plus aspirin versus OAC) varied from 0.6 to 3.6 (a 5-fold difference). A population-average model predicted that a TTR of 58% would be needed to be confident that patients would benefit from being on OAC.

Conclusions— A wide variation exists in international normalized ratio control, as measured by TTR, between clinical centers and between countries, which has a major impact on the treatment benefit of OAC therapy. For centers and countries, a target threshold TTR exists (estimated between 58% and 65%) below which there appears to be little benefit of OAC over antiplatelet therapy.


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE


Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2008 118: 2013-2014. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Kirchhof, J. Bax, C. Blomstrom-Lundquist, H. Calkins, A. John Camm, R. Cappato, F. Cosio, H. Crijns, H.-C. Diener, A. Goette, et al.
Early and comprehensive management of atrial fibrillation: executive summary of the proceedings from the 2nd AFNET-EHRA consensus conference 'research perspectives in AF'
Eur. Heart J., June 17, 2009; (2009) ehp235v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. Ahmed, H. J. G. M. Crijns, and I. C. Van Gelder
Treatment With Amiodarone to Prevent Atrial Fibrillation--Reply
JAMA, March 11, 2009; 301(10): 1020 - 1020.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
K. H. Tay, D. A. Lane, and G. Y. H. Lip
Challenges facing anticoagulation among the elderly and frail
Age Ageing, March 1, 2009; 38(2): 140 - 142.
[Full Text] [PDF]